As academics, we spend a lot of time writing about people we research, but we don’t always get the chance to write directly to them.
In this article for The Psychologist, Dr Hannah Fawcett, Dr Matt Brooks, and Dr Leanne Rimmer reflect on the emotional realities of jury service through an open letter to jurors. The piece explores how exposure to difficult evidence, responsibility for life-changing decisions, and restrictions on discussing cases can affect jurors both during and long after a trial has ended
The article emphasises that there is no “right” way to respond to jury service, and that reactions ranging from satisfaction and pride to grief, distress, uncertainty, or lingering reflection are all valid. It also highlights the growing recognition of juror wellbeing and the importance of supporting those who take on this vital civic role.
Thanks to The Psychologist for publishing the letter.
